Jan Švankmajer's "Food" (Jídlo)

A fantastically bizarre live-action and claymation film in three parts - Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner. Jídlo reminds me of Terri Timely's "Synaesthesia" though it is more of a political allegory than a re-imagining of a condition/concept. Švankmajer has a food fixation it seems, as he has presented in many other works (and most likely in some I have not seen yet): "Picnic with Weissmann" - 1968, "Flora" - 1989, "Meat Love" - 1989,  and "Little Otik (Otesánek)" - 2000.

So, now that I have posted half of Švankmajer's filmography, go out and buy something.

Organic Turkeys and Canadian Thanksgiving

This weekend I visited my grandparents' house in Elgin, ON for Canadian Thanksgiving. As much as some of my American friends have ripped on me about the Canadian version, it is not as spurious as I first thought (or at least not a simple imitation of the American celebration): Canada's first Thanksgiving.

Over dinner, I had a bit of a "trash the current state of affairs" talk with my grandfather. It's surprising how much my liberal-minded gripes over the environment and mass industrialization can overlap with that of an old man disturbed by changes in material relations (production, labor, etc.) as well as cultural transformations (some of which I can't say I agree with him on). I get the feeling however, if he had not been raised in the first half of the 20th century with its set of traditional social and cultural values, and if people in our era hadn't turned out to be such white-collar wimps, he may have been a social democrat like his grandson.

Anyway, we got around to talking about farms and groceries. When he was younger, his idea of a farm was a varietal and familial institution - they were to have many animals, many crops and to respect the animals. Now we have mono-cropping and restrictive raising standards that force out the small or organic farmer. There are only three suppliers of meat for grocers locked into distribution contracts with companies like President's Choice or independents without affluent clientele who can support a market for organic and heritage products. These products would not be so expensive,  would be more widely-available and would not need an affluent clientele to support the market, if the restrictions imposed on farmers did not so heavily favour mass production. It seems like there is a hell of a lot of paranoia, and plenty is justified by the fear that our birds and pigs are going to be infected by wild animals.

From Tea Hill Farms.

So, following my Thanksgiving dinner and a talk of times gone by that someday I hope to reclaim, I came across this article on turkeys that better explains the challenges that small-scale farmers face today: "The Toronto Star: Turkey wars".

Happy Thanksgiving!

How food shapes our cities: Carolyn Steel on TED.com

Gourmet, America's oldest food magazine, folding

UPDATED (10/15/2009): For the last word on Gourmet, check out the Q&A with Ruth Reichl for the New York Times Magazine.

Gourmet magazine is folding. No wonder Ruth Reichl has been on high gear the last couple of years with her career aside from the magazine.

About three months ago I began to write a post on how wasteful subscriptions to magazines such as Food and Wine, Gourmet, Bon Appetit and Cook's Illustrated were. I never got around to publishing it, but now I really wish I had.

The motivation for the post came from the fact that I canceled my subscriptions to all four about a year ago, after a two year stint with each. I feel as though seventy five percent of these magazines are advertisements and the other quarter is food porn and promotional recipes and reviews.

I can't really say I am sad to see Gourmet go the way of the dinosaurs, but I will miss some of the photography.

Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs

I am a couple of weeks late in announcing the release of this film, but it is food related, so I am obligated! Released on September 18th, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs is the new CGI flick from Sony Pictures Animation based on the book from Judi and Ron Barrett.

Sure to be a kid-pleaser, it looks silly and fun. A blundering inventor, Flint Lockwood, has finally created something of use - a machine that changes any form of water moisture into food. The result is straight out of a kindergartener's crayon dream - raining hamburgers, oversized Jell-O molds and icing on everything.

Now, you have to understand that I love a good CGI movie. Pixar, the industry pioneer and reigning leader, has kept me coming back for nearly every release since Toy Story. Pixar redefined what "All Audiences" has to mean, showing that movies of this kind can be entertaining for everyone, and not merely suitable for all. Just because it's safe for children to watch does not mean that everyone else has to be annoyed and bored for an hour and a half. Unfortunately, I get the feeling that Chance of Meatballs suffers from the sort of corny humour (ugh... no pun intended) that forces some CGI movies to be relegated to Blockbuster's stacks for children. They are just too cheesy (pun fully-intended... I give up). Depending on your sense of humour, the following information may make up your mind for you: the directors are writer-producers for CBS's primetime sitcom How I Met Your Mother.

Check out the trailer below!

Neuromodulation and Taste Hedonics: How good can taste get?

I can't quite remember how I stumbled upon this first link to the neurotechnology blog 'Brain Stimulant': Magnifying Taste Pleasure by Neuromodulation. The post begins by discussing the possibilities for enhancing the pleasure derived from one's experience of taste; not by making better food, but through neuromodulation ("the alteration of nerve activity through the delivery of electrical stimulation or chemical agents to targeted sites of the body." International Neuromodulation Society) and the study of taste hedonics (the affective response to food, of liking it or feeling pleasure).

My first thought about all of this is - WHY? As the article discusses, we already modify and amplify our pleasure derived from food every day - without microchip implants. Besides, does this not mask the real problem? You know, a lack of well-grown and prepared food?

But then I got to thinking... this could have huge implications, both positive and negative. I must admit that it makes me uncomfortable to think of people who would not otherwise enjoy a specific food or flavour, ultimately being able to over-ride their displeasure with pharmaceutical drugs or biotechnology. Instead of the usual response of "UGHuaghh! This is awful!," someone could experience potentially extreme pleasure by simply activating an implanted microchip that stimulates particular receptors or releases drugs to simulate enjoyment. On the other hand, it interests me greatly to think of possibilities to increase the maximum threshold for pleasure from tasting and what it can tell us about how our sense of taste and smell work everyday.

So, for the fun of it, and with very limited knowledge of the technology, I put together a list of three potential future uses for magnifying or modifying taste pleasure by neuromodulation, either gleaned from Brain Stimulant or conjured myself:

1. We would be able to amplify, normalize or otherwise modify the experience of those who have handicaps, diseases, injuries or those with taste-related organs declining in efficacy due to age. In a previous post on our sense of taste, I had linked to an article on smell and taste disorders, which had a long list of potential 'taste disturbances'. Perhaps some of those affected by a disturbance due to neurodegeneration could experience pleasure from taste again or 'normally' for the first time. It could serve a rehabilitative function, easing those with eating disorders or taste disturbances from mouth cancer or burns back into a regular diet regime and temporarily simulate an enjoyment of food after they have been 'turned off' of certain foods or food in general.

As I said above, part of me thinks this is like over-riding the system. What I mean is that for those with neurological disorders or degeneration this is could be directly applicable, because it takes care of the part that is missing - the chemical response in the brain which makes us feel pleasure toward tasting things we like. For those without flavourful food to eat or those with damage to their nose or mouth, this type of solution side-steps the root problem. Would it be that you do not experience things as more flavourful, but you would be happier about tasting whatever it is you are tasting?

I am unsure how much our sensation of flavour and the sensation of feeling good from a flavour is differentiated in our experiences. If we are able to have taste must we also be having pleasure (or displeasure) of that taste? Is it more like a reward system, where pleasure is coupled to certain tastes, depending on the individual? This would mean they are separate phenomenon and is the intuitive way of breaking down the experience. Would people who have no ability to taste due to nasal or oral damage feel this as a fully-simulated pleasure, seemingly out of nowhere? Like taking a sip of water and then being eerily ecsatic about how it tastes? The flavour of the water has not improved, nor has your ability to taste, however your subjective response to the water has been. As Brain Stimulant says, "the chip could be specifically designed to artificially induce extreme taste qualia that would be uncoupled from any sort of eating."

Another part of me thinks that it may not matter to us that it would be an over-ride or simulated affect. For those who have diminished ability to taste, the simulated affect may not be apparent, like when we drink alcohol or smoke marijuana and things seem to objectively taste better, even though the things in themselves and our sensory organs that interact with them have not been improved (discussed further below).

2. We could make healthy foods seem to 'taste better' in order to encourage the enjoyment of healthy foods by those less inclined, for whatever reason. For example, Little Jimmy hates vegetables. Switch on his taste-pleasure microchip when you need him to eat those damned brussel sprouts and he'll enjoy them beyond belief, while obtaining their nutritional value. That example is awful, since it involves coercion, but some people may voluntarily wish to enjoy healthy foods that they genuinely experience as not tasting good (picky eaters out on a date?). I don't believe this should be necessary in any society, however the way people eat today... maybe it wouldn't be such a bad thing. Again, this solution side-steps the root problem for some, which is the cost, availability, time and know-how involved in preparing food that is nutritional and flavourful.

3. The last possible use that I can foresee is twofold: we increase or decrease our maximum potential for pleasure from taste, perhaps allowing us to better understand how taste functions normally and experience taste in a way inconceivable by current standards, but also put ourselves at risk for recreational uses of the technology which could exacerbate food addictions to a point equally inconceivable today. People could become addicted to the enhanced pleasure from food or begin to consume things that are traditionally considered inedible, all due to the use, or misuse, of such technology.

It's not that just traditionally 'bad tasting' foods, or challenging flavours could easily become delectable by inducing pleasure, but things that are not healthy to eat, as well as things that we are really not supposed to eat, could become tolerable, yet unhealthy or even poisonous. Not only would brussel sprouts taste better, but how about cat litter? You want that to taste good? Sure, why not. There may be no way to differentiate when the chip is switched on. There is a reason certain things taste terrible - they might kill us and we evolved to not like them.

One more example - let's pretend that you absolutely love the duck-a-l'orange from that bistro around the corner, and it has a sauce with a special twist you still haven't been able to figure out. If you can believe it, you could love it a hell of a lot more if you had a taste-related pleasure-magnifying/simulating chip implanted. However, I am not sure whether this technology would stifle your attempt to pick out the 'twist' to the sauce or if it would allow you to perceive flavour better, thereby finally allowing you to figure out that sauce. On the one hand, increasing your pleasure may increase your attention to the flavour. On the other hand, it may leave you awash in reverie over a little taste. I think of these two possibilities are exemplified by cases such as being stimulated by a drug, song, film or sex. Sometimes the pleasure from sensory input can have the effect of causing you to see and understand material in a new and invigorating way with full attention. Other times it gets your mind worked up enough that the content of what you're perceiving loses it's status as the primary focus of your attention as you get lost in a wave of pleasure.

Finally, is it true that we would be collectively at a greater risk for food addictions than we are now? As I said previously, we already modify and amplify our perception of taste and pleasure. As BrainStimulant notes, we drink beer with our shitty pizza, it tastes great. We smoke a doobie with our shitty pizza, it tastes great. There is also the basic drive for food - we need it and are wired to seek it out, as well as specific flavours - fat, sugar, etc. If we were to amp up our pleasure systems, it seems as though we could make all foods literally irresistible. The next post however, Brain Stimulant: Is the Pleasure Molecule Dopamine?, may make you think otherwise, as it touches on the discussion of pleasure and desire, outlining what neurotransmitters and receptors are involved in the pleasure experienced from taste.

The article starts by questioning whether or not dopamine is involved in pleasure. Apparently, pleasure and desire may be separate phenomena. Dopamine is responsible for our desire (and therefore addictive behaviour), while the mu-opioid and endocannabinoid receptors are responsible for taste pleasure. It is claimed that dopamine plays a minimal role in our experience of pleasure from taste sensation. If this is true, we could selectively enhance our brain chemistry for pleasure, and circumvent desire, which forces us to engage in addictions. As stated above, we already act on these receptors today with marijuana and alcohol, and we can even see the obverse effect demonstrated in amphetamine and cocaine use, which are heavy on dopamine. Although we must note that alcohol is addictive - like heroin, our opioid and dopamine receptors are involved (but here I trail off because these drugs are not exclusive in the receptors they affect and complicate the picture unnecessarily). For the most part, it seems that things that are tasty, are not necessarily addictive, especially since they avoid the desirous dopamine. The problem of food addiction is much more complex than this, as we derive pleasure in a less simplistic way, in which memories come into play and the role of hunger and its mechanisms complicate the matter even more.

So what does this all amount to? Sadly, I'm not really sure, and what I am certain about is that it is something beyond my realm of knowledge in physiology, neuroscience, and philosophy.

Saveurs & Tentations, August 12-16th

Beginning today is the first annual Saveurs & Tentations! The event is taking place at Jacques-Cartier Quay (here in Montreal, with the rest of the Old Port piers, map), from August 12-16th.

I'm on my way out the door now to check it out. Pictures to come!

Dépanneur Le Pick-Up, Featured in the New York Times "The Moment"

At one time, Montreal seemed manageable. It is an extremely small city, walkable from end-to-end, composed mostly of old neighborhoods around a small downtown core and obligatory cookie-cutter suburbs on the outskirts. There's actually not much city to speak of. When you hear Montreal is small, you get the impression that you can master the city; get a hold of it, tackle it in pieces or consume it whole and then watch it grow and change under your supervision. Then you realize there are far too many people, cultures and turnovers in business to ever wrestle this city into submission.

Why am I going on about Montreal like this? I'm a little overwhelmed. Despite having lived in this city for nearly five years now, someone from the New York Times has to tell me about Montreal's newest and best goings-on.

For example, The New York Times "The Moment" blog series has foiled my "first scoop" plans in the past, and continues to beat me to the punch, as Genevieve Paiement staked out Dépanneur Le Pick-Up. Her article can be found here: Pulled Pork and Performance Art in Montreal.

I feel a little better knowing that the Mirror did a feature on Le Pick-Up, as did the Gazette, the MartiniBoys have taken notice, La Presse was probably the first to make mention of this revamped dépanneur, and Genevieve Paiement is a Montreal resident. I'm late to the action, but not too late, and I am in good company. If only I could receive a $/word paycheck for publishing a review of a restaurant that five other media sources had just exhausted...

Dépanneur Le Pick-Up seems to have the potential to become a hipster haunt, but if they serve a good pulled pork sandwich I could not care less. The head chef has worked at Au Pied de Cochon and Garde Manger, so he knows what he's doing. Apparently there is small-scale theatre, music, performances and displays that take place as well. Their website has a list of events, a menu, photos and even a blog. Variety is essential for operating a successful dép, and I am all for trading Brillo pads and toilet paper for "performance art and pulled pork" (cheap smokes, beer and snacks are still offered). There's probably another normal dép at the end of the block anyway.

O.Noir branches out from MTL to TO

O.Noir is pointless. Add the Opaque restaurants on the west coast and the Dark Dining Project at Camaje in the West Village to the list of restaurant fads as well. Except for their policy of hiring visually-impaired staff, I really see no benefit to a restaurant in which you cannot see your food.

I understand the need for 'difference' in matters of stimulation and appreciation. What I mean is that it is common to believe that to being presented with objects that are set against a background that frames or focuses our attention by way of contrast or heightening the demand of certain senses over others facilitates our focus on a specific object. We are able distinguish it from our surroundings and then evaluate without distraction. A painting is set in a frame and hung on a wall that is not visually busy, in a gallery that allows contemplation and focus. Or, a symphony requires relative silence so that it can be heard at all, however nearly absolute silence offers an opportunity to better enjoy and judge the music without distraction. These cases function on the logic that diminishing the demand on senses that are not primary to experiencing the piece at hand, and focusing the demand of those which are, allows us to use those senses that are required in a greater capacity. Many people claim that their listening experience is enhanced by closing their eyes or being in a dark, quiet and still, essentially non-distracting  venue. This all reminds me of the old 'go blind and your hearing will become superhuman' claim that I am sure has some validity to it.

Like food, music's impact can be both enhanced or reduced by visual elements. and visual arts can be enhanced by things like music and setting in general (why does it always have to be a cold, quiet galliery?) Unlike food however, music is not essentially visual, nor or visual pieces essentially auditory. To continue the music-food analogy, a silent setting to music is not the same as a dark restaurant to food. Sometimes music is better in the dark, and sometimes your food may be visually distracting. In the latter, this would be unfortunate cases of style over substance. It does not taste nearly as nice as it looks or costs, which is a feeling that I am sure many people harbor toward fine dining. On the other hand, I like to think that in most cases visual enticement works to further excite our mind, stomach and mouths. To limit your senses seems like sacrilege to me. We salivate on sight, are primed by delightful settings, and without these cues we are missing integral parts of the dining experience.

Just watch this video and try to tell me this seems both enjoyable and worth the extra money for the 'experience'. They say it is all about texture and smells, but I just don't (won't?) buy it. Should food not always be about such things? If you cannot appreciate your food for its texture, taste and smell without a blindfold then maybe you have not been actually appreciating food. This Dana Salisbury person just seems full of gimmicky bullshit. (The girl who does a Stevie Wonder impression 16 seconds in is hilarious, but definitely not right.)

I suppose the dining experience cannot be essentialized though. Perhaps our other senses - olfactory, auditory and sensing temperature - will compensate and allow us to enjoy our food just as much at O.Noir (I won't go so far as to say 'more at O.Noir', but it is certainly a different enjoyment). After all, studies in the past  have shown no increase in salivation upon seeing pictures of food. But their method is flawed and the studies are old (ranging from the 1920's to mid-1970's) - unless I am starving, sterile pictures of food are not going to do much for me, especially since they are so prevalent and how easily we become habituated. If you were to isolate a plate of food from me however - cut off the smell, taste and temperature by way of a Plexiglas box, I guarantee it will make me salivate. Personally, I just want to see my food. It helps with textural perception (Rosenthal, Andrew. Food texture: measurement and perception (1999). pp. 3-5), prepares our mouth and stomach, and provides visual pleasure (as well as a dining experience that is not characterized by confusion).

I don't want to present just one side of the story though. O.Noir owner Moa Alameddine and his employees sum up the dining experience well in the following article, ("Dining in the dark: Concept restaurant offers feast for senses - except sight") and video, providing us with a history of the dark dining concept that makes these restaurants seems more legitimate in my opinion:

Finally, if you are interested in more dark dining, a comprehensive list of other "eating in the dark" restaurants can be found here:

"The World's Dark Restaurants"

Creepy Robot Chefs of the Future

I'm not too sure how I feel about this.

MNN.com: "40 farmers under 40" and Captain Planet.

Whenever I get backed into a corner in life, especially if it is school or a job getting me down, I have a consoling claim that I always repeat to myself: "Screw this! I am leaving, and I am going to be a farmer." It's quite irrational, and no doubt stems from a mix of my own misconceptions - a romanticized image of farming, and any apparently irreconcilable differences with whatever I happen to be doing at the time that is a source of stress and most likely city-centered.

The following group of farmers, featured by the Mother Nature Network (MNN), makes my claim seem a little less ridiculous however. They are all under 40 and have varying backgrounds and applications of agriculture today. Many have taken off from their city lives to carry out their pastoral dreams, some are urban farmers, while others are born and bred family farmers. To quote MNN,

"They're urban, they hold advanced degrees and they're often female. They sprout up in not-so-bucolic places like Brooklyn, Oakland, Atlanta and Indianapolis, and they sometimes work as educators, eco-entrepreneurs, yogis, journalists, filmmakers, activists and doting parents on the side. They're passionate and adventurous. And most notably, they're focused on sustainability and community building."

Also at MNN.com, and back from the dead, is CAPTAIN PLANET (he never really died, but was definitely cancelled on cable).




To see the full list of farmers, click the link below:
MNN.com: 40 farmers under 40

To watch Captain Planet for some retro-satisfaction, click here:
MNN.com: Captain Planet

Marriott, Mikasa, Montreal - Concrete slab falls, crushes diners.

Thursday night, at one of the nicer sushi bars in Montreal, a slab of concrete fell from the Marriott hotel, crashing through the roof of Mikasa's windowed dining room -- killing Léa Guilbeault and injuring her husband. Reports are conflicting, however it is assumed that the slab crushed and killed Guilbeault on contact (and judging from the Gazette reports, it was extremely gory). She was out for an early birthday celebration with her husband. Her birthday was today.

Mikasa is just up the street from where I work, and I once ate there awkwardly with an ex for lunch. That is the extent that I will go to tie myself to this story though, as it seems the Gazette and every other Montreal media outlet has limited itself to mainly "eye-witness accounts," as passers-by and fellow diners have been quoted extensively.

Three days later, very minimal discussion has taken place in the media about why the slab may have fallen in the first place. Considering our weather, I thought regular building safety checks would have been carried out. The Marriott building had not been inspected since 2000, but I am unsure if this is a relatively long time or not when it comes to examining structural integrity. Either way, it was too long in this case. Sometimes I forget the extent to which city services must be in disarray. Things are seemingly under control, but the reality is that we consistently engage in patchwork and band-aid solutions.

This raises a whole range of questions - who is liable? will the victim's family sue Marriott? should the city be conducting more regular and stricter building inspections? will Mikasa sue Marriott? how can Mikasa possibly survive as a successful restaurant after this gruesome tragedy took place in its main dining room? What do we expect of all the involved parties and how far do we go to prevent such things from happening before it is an absurd precaution and restriction upon our daily activities?

Read the Gazette and CBC article below for more information:

CBC: Montreal probes death of woman killed by falling concrete

Montreal Gazette: 'We were sitting next to them, oh my God'


Note: This is a quote from a Listserv e-mail I just received at work:

Please be advised that starting at 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 21st, an architect from ___ will be inspecting the masonry on the building façade. He will require access to offices at the front of the building. Please accord him access as required.

I imagine many institutions and companies, both public and private, will be conducting voluntary 'facade' checks. Such as at my building, where decorative stone could really do some damage:

Tourisme Montréal

I just found this YouTube channel for Tourisme Montréal.



While the content varies greatly, there are a ton of food & drink related videos. The culinary spots are usually hosted by Katherine Rollet, whose interjections can get kind of tiresome, but judging from the selection of restaurants, bakeries and cafés she definitely has great taste. In addition to an Epicurean section, they also have:

• Nightlife - they do a feature on Baldwin Barmacie which is a bar I'm a fan of, as well as hipster-haunts Blizzarts, Korova and Billy Kun.
  
• Arts & Culture - Musée Beaux Arts, the Jazz Festival, Tam Tams, as well as neighbourhood tours are offered.
  
• Girls' Getaway - not sure?
  
• Gay Life - most of which is shot down by my apartment in the Amherst/Beaudry area, where we see the male host and his drag-double partake in activities such as receiving a lesbian haircut (first on his receding hairline and then on their wig), hunt for antiques, and check out local clothing stores.

The Epicurean Life section offers some of the best material out of the bunch. It is kind of uppity and obviously advertisement-like, but it covers so many places that are to my liking, with features on our city's markets and the new Müvbox concept-restaurant, along with other culinary walking tours and restaurant stops that reflect the refined crowd they are trying to court from Toronto and New York City.

This series of videos joins the already existing repertoire of high-production value promotional materials recently developed by Tourisme Montréal, as can be seen on their Montreal TV site. Personally, I prefer something a bit less glossy, but they gotsta get the $$$ I 'spose.

Farm aid vs. Food aid

After finally going to see Food, Inc. and hearing of the G8's recent commitments to farm aid over food aid, I can't help but write about such things. For as long as I can remember, the G8, 'G20', and Western governments have generally subscribed to a view of so-called development in the developing world. A more accurate description of the relationship between developed and developing nation-states would be one of dependency, accompanied by an overarching, yet subtlely-framed theme of 'food security' (whose security they are referring to depends on who you are speaking to though).

Such an approach is more in line with what politicians have openly discussed as burden-sharing, and the panic that is felt when a lack of food leads to political instability, therefore becoming an international security concern as refugees flood over borders. However, we continue to send bags of rice and grain, sterilized seed and other short-term support measures - policy enactments that fail to include a practical and long-term "teach a man to fish" angle. We need to meet immediate needs while literally sowing the seeds for future self-sufficiency.

The idea of offering emergency food aid alone - whether it be bags of grain, money or some combination thereof - has long been understood as a stop-gap measure (except by state politicians it seems). There are many reasons this type of aid continues without the accompaniment of enduring development programmes however:

• a paradoxical philosophy of self-determination, state sovereignty, and responsibility (we wouldn't want to meddle in the affairs of other states by intervening with education and training, but moral obligations state that something must be done);
• a food-drop or bank transfer seems like the most direct, time-efficient and therefore cost-efficient manner of dealing with the hunger dilemma;
• and following from the previous two justifications, yet of a more psychological nature, it is a worry doll solution (let the irony of the Guatemalan history and tourist appropriation of the dolls sink in).
  

If you talk about the problem and then throw money at it so the issue has been dealt with in some capacity, it can then be checked off the list of crisis-level priorities and be stricken from most people's consciences for the time being. That is, until the politicians are due back at the next international conference with their renewed sets of worries and guilt while they cynically wonder how the aid-receiving state could have 'wasted' all that money.

Of course, starvation and hunger persists, Oh-Dearism has become rampant among the increasingly rich, while the often violently, yet sometimes quiescently oppressed populations suffer in apathetic dependence, so leaders of the most wealthy nations respond the only way they know how to, or at least to the extent that they are willing to commit, by pledging aid money and dropping rice from airplanes. The legitimacy of a 'pledge' is quite suspect though. A media-safe and public-satisfying dollar amount (such as the $20-billion recently announced by the G8 in L'Aquila, Italy) will have already been pledged years ago in some manner, perhaps publicly but quite often not, and is simply shuffled from one report or budget to that of the newly-adopted and renamed strategy for feeding the poor.

Obama has other things in mind apparently, and has lead a world-wide shift in policy from food aid to farm aid. I am unsure of how to deal with the whole issue. Emergency aid needs to continue, while we assist people in growing their own food. Under current conditions however, I see no way to help without being heavy-handed, and therefore risking relations with the (often corrupt) governments of these nations in dire need. NGO and UN workers are constantly at risk of being received as bearers of western imperialism, soldiers are obviously not perceived as liberators or saviors, yet we cannot continue to fight the problem with short-term solutions that do not address the root issue of having an incapacity for domestic food production and distribution. I'm hoping the second McGill Conference on Global Food Security in October will provide me with some answers or at least steer me in the right direction.

FarmVille

Bored and on Facebook?

Checkout FarmVille. I won't, but you might like it.

Taste: "The Superhero Of Senses"

Here is a good article from Forbes for you. It is about how resilient, but easily affected, our sense of taste can be:

The Superhero Of Senses by Jonathan Fahey.

Also, if you would like to know more about the olfactory and taste systems, as well as potential disorders, this article from the American Academy of Family Physicians is all-encompassing, yet provides plenty of basic information about the anatomy of smell and taste (with many diagrams!):

Smell and Taste Disorders: A Primary Care Approach
Steven M. Bromley, M.D.
University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

In New York? Miss Montréal? Mile End in Brooklyn.

St. Viateur and Fairmont bagels, poutine, St. Ambroise beer and more at Mile End restaurant in Brooklyn.

97 Hoyt St.
(Atlantic and Pacific Aves.)


Someone let me know how it is??

"When Seal is on the Menu"

It seems as though the seal hunt is always in the media. Every year PETA and the world press highlight its commencement and exert pressure on the seal industry to find a humane end to this issue... an issue that I cannot seem to take a side on.

I first saw the seal hunt in action, beyond the horrible baby-seal-blood-splattered-snow image, on Anthony Bourdain's show No Reservations back in 2007, where he visited an Inuit community in northern Quebec (these videos are not for the faint-hearted, but you gain a respect for one culture's use of the animal):

Then we have Canada's Governor General, Michaëlle Jean, cutting open a seal and eating its raw heart:

So when I read these New York Times articles about seal on the menu at Au Cinquième Péché, as well as several other restaurants in Montréal, I felt like I had to share:

and "Canadian Chefs Serve Seal, With a Side of Controversy" both by Micheline Maynard.

Salt!

Did you know a 1/2 cup of Cheerios has more salt than 31 individual Ms. Vickie's brand chips? Scary. No wonder the FDA is giving General Mills such a hard time.

When cooking, I mostly fail to consider the salt content of my food, unless it is related to flavor. After being reminded in nearly every recipe that calls for butter or stock, I only buy unsalted butter and low or no sodium stocks (veal, chicken, veg). In my opinion, your meals should not be salty, but they should be well-seasoned with salt so to stimulate saliva production.

Both acid and salt act alike in this way. Many people will make the mistake of continuing to add salt to their dish, when a squeeze of lemon or vinegar would have done the trick. As you produce saliva, it begins to chemically break-down what you are also mechanically breaking-down by chewing. While saliva acts as a first stage of digestion, it also affects the sensitivity of our TASTE BUDS.

I would by lying to myself if I denied being in love with soy sauce, salt & vinegar chips, and salted snack mix though. They tear my mouth apart and create both a satisfaction and urge to repeat like only sodium can. They're great, seriously. Since I have a bipolar penchant for controlling and consuming, I inevitably began to wonder about the food that I eat daily, which is prepared to some degree, but I have yet to check or even care about the sodium content.

Then pops up this 'Special Report' by The Globe & Mail. You should click-through to the multi-part series here: The Globe & Mail - Salt: Hard to Shake. The articles are comprehensive, while the videos have the usual CTV hokey-ness to them. It is a pretty decent feature, despite sometimes attempting to reproduce the same diet-craze formula we know so well when we hear the words cholesterol, fat, trans-fat, carbohydrates, and now salt. I feel like a health-nut or an old man talking about this sort of thing. I will make sure that my following post is a little lighter in mood.

I promise. I will not mention tuna for months after this.

LINK: Japanese scientists to breed 'super tuna'

"Japanese scientists will have bred a new "super-tuna" within a decade that will be stronger, more resistant to disease and taste better than the bluefin presently in the oceans."